Aren’t skeptics supposed to express genuine doubt at new ideas? Aren’t we supposed to be against rapid change just for the sake of change?
So, why is my skepticism against the new Theory of Evolution not valid? Why is the skepticism directed towards the multi-thousand year theory of Biblical Creation considered Science, but the same skepticism directed towards modern ‘Science’ considered invalid?
Now, I admit, I have a great bunch of readers. And most of the Skeptics who contribute to our conversation against Faith are reasonable about their skepticism.
And I appreciate that.
But, why aren’t ‘scholars’ and ‘Scientists’ as skeptical and tolerant as you my readers?
Am I the only one who notices this? Or, do you notice this as well?