Here was a classic debate.
I found Ehrman’s points to be clear. However, he seemed to argue his straw-man arguments.
Ironically, his arguments led me to feel Ehrman was angry and a little bitter.
Although, I did enjoy his argument about his cat toying with a mouse. Yet, I did not feel that his cat is a mini-Hitler.
And unfortunately, D’Souza skipped one answer, he did answer the intellectual and not the personal.
How about anyone else?